![]() I can’t speak to the TBS Disco but I know those arms are also a little flexible so see potential for not-ideal autotune, but I’m sure you can check the forums to see what people with that frame are saying about those. You do have to mind the arms from time to time after a crash to make sure they don’t twist the motor’s vertical axis even slightly (this will throw off any flight controller not just the pixhawk) but overall it is a great frame, and is the frame I used for the demo videos on the acro wiki page. The frame I use to test out Acro for Leanord is the Cinetank Mk.2 from and it is a very solid design. I’ve run the pixhawk on the qav400 and it is fine but can be tricky to autotune due to the flex inherent to the dirty frame. I’ve seen a few others that are fully decked out and they are certainly crowded – but they fly just fine. Leonard is spot on with the qav250, his is a bit tight and a bit heavy but it still flies fine. All aluminum alloy material: Anti-rust and anti-drop, strong and durable, only 28g, lightweight and portable Also. I’ll regularly pop up high, point the nose down via 270 backflip and do 3-4 rolls with an ACRO_RP_P value of 11 or 12 coming out of the maneuver no problem. Also, note that Rob said don’t push it too hard – which means you can push it, but, at some point when you start getting very aggressive with flips rolls in succession, that’s when you may have problems. Just to add to Leonard and Rob’s comments, Acro is very solid for me as well, and is the flight mode of choice when I am flying even my gimbal ships in fpv. What do you think about a QAV 400 or a Discovery TBS Pro? I seriously doubt a QAV 250 could hold a Pixhawk, or I'd even consider that. Aimed to build a durable and crash resistant multirotor. This version includes a brushless camera mount for GoPro together with it's Alexmos stabilisation system. I was thinking about something small, but not so small that I couldn't mount a Pixhawk on it well. Drones, UAV, OnyxStar, MikroKopter, ArduCopter, RPAS : AltiGator TBS DISCOVERY PRO + Gimbal (top / bottom plate & gimbal) - The TBC DISCOVERY PRO is well know for it's easiness of build in comparison with other equivalent frames. expensive summer office several release roll student update suffer sister. It sounds like the perfect way to learn without crashing a lot of hardware.ġ) How mature is the Acro trainer feature? Is this something that has been well tested and debugged at some point?Ģ) And how stable is ArduCopter's Acro mode in general? Is that fairly debugged and tested?ģ) Given all the recent changes with the EKF, would any of that impact the Acro and Acro Trainer features? Would I be more prone to DCM/EKF errors and triggering forced landings? Should I completely turn the EKF off, or does Acro mode do that automatically?Ĥ) What frame would your recommend for Acro training? Obviously a larger and/or more expensive frame makes a crash more expensive. crazy url etc wear short worry interesting allow drop worst easier amount. ![]() I'm considering trying to learn flying in Acro mode and I'm also intrigued by the Acro Trainer mode. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |